Showing posts with label Deposit Protection Dispute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deposit Protection Dispute. Show all posts

Monday, 4 July 2011

Happy Deposit Protection Dispute Clients

I thought I would share some recent testimonials with you from satisfied customers of ADR Solution.
“I can highly recommend Tom's services. He has always been very helpful and willing to go the extra mile. He has a great level of expertise and knowledge. He has saved me a huge amount of of time and effort when having to deal with property issues. His company offers a very unique service which is extremely useful to any landlord who manages their own property. I have found him extremely good value for money!” 
C. Surujpaul, London

Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Student Deposit Dispute Season

If the weather is anything to go by, summer is upon us already, which can only mean one thing for thousands of landlords up and down the country: student changeover time.
In my, admittedly anecdotal, experience adjudicating deposit disputes, there are three groups of people responsible for significantly more damage to rented property than everyone else put together. They are:
  1. Barristers (the shame!)
  2. Doctors. I saw a defence from a tenant once that read “I don’t have to clean, I’m a doctor”. They didn’t win.
  3. Students. It’s no surprise really. Students have a well deserved reputation for trashing properties and there will be very few student landlords who don’t need to make a claim on any protected deposits this summer, so here is some advice for landlords in the run up to changeover season.

Monday, 6 June 2011

Better Inventories Required

Better Evidence For Landlords
I have been very busy recently getting a new project off the ground which could really change the fortunes of landlords and letting agents in deposit protection disputes. 

The Problem With Inventories

All too often landlords lose deposit disputes simply because their inventory evidence doesn’t show what they need it to show. Inventory clerks tend to focus their attention on any parts of the property that are already damaged, whereas what landlords require is an inventory that shows the property in it’s undamaged condition at the beginning of the tenancy. Only with concrete evidence that the property was in good condition to start with can the landlord show that the tenant is responsible for any change in condition - damage to the property.
Ordinary inventories tend to come with a dozen or so photographs by way of supporting visual evidence. It is simply not possible with a few photographs to categorically demonstrate the condition and cleanliness of every part of every wall, every metre of skirting board, or the inside of every kitchen cupboard. 

A New Inventory

I have been working closely with the Video Inventory Network on their video inventory training course, developing a system that enables inventory clerks to take an average of 60,000 still images per inventory to corroborate their work.

Monday, 9 May 2011

Useful Guidance From The Deposit Protection Schemes

I was very pleased last week that the deposit protection schemes have finally got together to offer some joint advice on the dispute process. The advice itself is very practical and if you are involved in a dispute, I would recommend you read it. Each scheme has published their own version, but I am assured the text is the same in each. Even I am not dull enough to compare them. Read the booklet here:

Tuesday, 19 April 2011

The Future Of Deposit Protection Disputes


I had a really enjoyable day last week giving an inventory masterclass to the experienced team at Inventory House in London’s Docklands, who had asked me to consult on the format and content of their inventories. Their inventory product is already very professional and the guys really know their business inside out, so we were able to delve very deep into what makes a great inventory, touching on subjects as diverse as how deposit protection adjudicators arrive at decisions and awards, how to maintain admissibility of evidence for criminal court and how language is used to describe phenomena in quantum mechanics.
One of the recurring themes of the day was whether the deposit protection dispute model as currently practiced is sustainable and how the inventory industry, and other interested parties, might be able to influence any developments.
Several questions kept recurring which included: 
Whether the methodology for resolving disputes through adjudication could be standardised, as there is a feeling that the standard of proof was interpreted differently across the schemes?
Whether the schemes could agree a baseline of expected lifespans for commonly claimed for items (such as carpet) in an average tenancy, to prevent landlords claiming with unrealistic expectations, or unnecessarily pursuing claims that are without merit?
A feeling that the trained inventory professional’s opinion is underused led to discussion of whether a (self?) regulated inventory industry adhering to common standards could remove some of the burden from the deposit protection schemes’ dispute resolution departments?
Answers on a postcard please...

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Thoughts on Universal Estates v Tiensia and Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher

Universal Estates v Tiensia and Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher were joined as a single appeal. The judgment handed down by the Court of Appeal on 11th November 2010 is widely considered to have confirmed a loophole in the deposit protection legislation, but the exact nature of the precedent set has been a cause of some confusion amongst landlords.

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Mould: Condensation v Damp

A conversation with a client last week made me realise just how many deposit protection disputes are over the cost of repairing mould. As an adjudicator, I would dread claims relating to mould, not just because the pictures of black and green slime colonising walls would make my skin crawl, but because they always came down to the same argument, and sometimes it was very difficult to know who was right.

Thursday, 27 January 2011

Prevention, Rather Than Cure

It’s the nature of the business that I’m in that I deal with a lot of unhappy landlords. Landlords who have had their trust abused, been ripped off and left to clear up someone else’s mess. Most of the people reading this blog will have been in that situation at some time or another.
Most landlords come to me for help sorting the situation out, but we often get round to discussing how to prevent it happening next time. Naturally we talk about inventories, interim inspections and properly drafted tenancy agreements, which I will no doubt discuss the finer points of in the future, but I also raise the issue of tenant referencing. 

Friday, 14 January 2011

Welcome

Welcome to the Deposit Protection Dispute Blog. This blog is written by Tom Derrett of ADR Solution.

We will be looking at all aspects of deposit protection disputes and the legal side of letting, landlord and tenant relations and life in general, through the lens of the ADR Solution office window.

Please feel free to add your comments or take an RSS feed. If you want to contact ADR Solution with a specific enquiry, and you are reading this on www.adrsolution.co.uk, please use the contact form, email us, or give us a call on 0845 519 4597. We will be very happy to discuss your situation without charge.

Thank you for reading, and come back again soon.